Prosecutors Demand Two-Year Prison Sentence for South Korean Opposition Leader Lee Jae-myung Over False Statements in Presidential Election
South Korean prosecutors have requested a two-year prison sentence for Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the opposition Democratic Party of Korea, over accusations of making false statements during the last presidential election. Lee has maintained his innocence, claiming he never intentionally lied and asking the court to clear him of all charges. The final ruling is scheduled for November 15.
Prosecutors: "Lee Jae-myung Repeated Lies to the Entire Nation"
During a court hearing on September 20, the prosecution argued that Lee Jae-myung deliberately made false statements to secure his victory in the 2022 presidential election, urging the court to impose a two-year sentence. According to the prosecution, Lee's repeated falsehoods during televised broadcasts had a significant influence on voter decision-making, warranting serious consequences.
"The defendant's actions undermined the fairness of the election and distorted the voters' choices through falsehoods. Such actions require severe punishment, regardless of his position," prosecutors stated. They argued that Lee’s influence as a political figure should not protect him from the legal consequences of his actions.
Lee Jae-myung: "I Never Intentionally Lied"
In his final defense, Lee denied the accusations, asserting that any misstatements were unintentional. "I never lied on purpose. The stress and effort I endured during the campaign were overwhelming. Why would someone like me, running for president, deliberately lie?" he asked the court.
Lee also criticized the prosecution for what he described as a politically motivated attack. "Is it right for the prosecution to use its power to suppress political opponents, fabricate charges, and manipulate evidence to destroy them? This abuse of power threatens the very foundation of democracy," he claimed.
Key Controversies: Kim Moon-gi and Baekhyeon-dong
The allegations against Lee stem from statements made about two separate scandals involving Kim Moon-gi, a former public official, and Baekhyeon-dong, a real estate development project. Prosecutors argued that Lee falsely claimed to have no personal relationship with Kim, despite evidence suggesting otherwise, including golf and fishing trips together. Additionally, they accused Lee of lying during a live televised audit about his role in the Baekhyeon-dong real estate scandal.
Lee’s legal team pushed back, stating that Lee’s remarks were subjective and not intended to deceive. They further argued that the prosecution's case relies on speculation rather than hard evidence. "The law only punishes deliberate falsehoods, and my client did not intentionally mislead the public," his attorney stated.
Implications for Lee and South Korean Politics
If convicted, Lee faces severe political consequences. Under South Korean law, a conviction with a fine exceeding 1 million won ($750) would disqualify him from holding public office for five years, which would result in the loss of his seat in parliament. Additionally, the Democratic Party would be required to return 43.4 billion won ($32.4 million) in campaign funds received after the last election.
Lee is currently facing multiple legal battles, including cases related to bribery and election law violations. His next court appearance, related to allegations of perjury, is scheduled for September 30.
Journalist’s Perspective
The charges against Lee Jae-myung highlight the complex relationship between politics and the judiciary in South Korea. This case comes at a critical time for the country, with public trust in democratic institutions facing increased scrutiny. While Lee argues that the charges are politically motivated, the prosecution's insistence on accountability reflects a broader push for transparency and fairness in the electoral process. Whether this trial will result in a significant shift in South Korea’s political landscape remains to be seen, but it undoubtedly raises important questions about the integrity of the country’s legal system and the standards to which public officials are held.
Opinion: Is Justice Truly Blind in South Korea?
This case serves as a reminder that democracy requires the unwavering application of the law, regardless of an individual’s political stature. If Lee Jae-myung's claims of political persecution hold any truth, it would expose deep flaws in South Korea’s legal framework. On the other hand, if the accusations are valid, it reinforces the importance of holding leaders accountable. Either way, this trial has the potential to shape South Korea’s democracy for years to come.
